“Young Washington” Is Imperialist Propaganda
Telling a story about the French and Indian Wars from the perspective of the British prioritizes the perspective of the colonizers.
Sorrentino captures this sense of appearing instead of arriving in the most dramatic “freeze-frame” of the entire film. Fabietto and Marchino (Marlon Joubert) are walking home from an audition Marchino had with Federico Fellini when they see Maradona sitting in the car. Most of the other “freeze frames” employ editing as punctuation and appear at the end or beginning of any given scene. But for Maradona, Sorrentino pauses Fabietto and Marchino mid-conversation with “It’s him!” and pans to show more than ten other people frozen in place, staring at Maradona sitting in his car. And then, as quick as it came, Sorrentino cuts to the middle of the next scene, in which no one believes Fabietto and Marchino saw Maradona.
Alongside Maradona’s appearance, Sorrentino’s love letter to Naples presents us with Fabietto gaining self-awareness of his sexual desires. Several moments capture this transition, from Fabietto seeing several beautiful women arrive to audition with Fellini to spying on Fellini erecting a collage to the attractive women he knows to Fabietto’s Aunt Patrizia (Luisa Ranieri) asking him for a towel while she is sunbathing nude in front of the rest of the family. Another narrative pause, appearing shortly after the thirty-minute mark, shows Fabietto and Patrizia walking behind the rest of the family, sharing jokes until Patrizia stops. The camera cuts between the two to capture a last shared look (similar to Ally and Jackson Maine in the 2018 A Star Is Born). A first watch gives this exchange undertones of desire but knowing Patrizia’s ultimate condemnation of an institution for an indefinite stay makes it feel transient.
The transitory feeling of these “freeze frame” moments gives Sorrentino’s autobiographical love letter gravitas. They emphasize this film as an act of remembering instead of recounting. Just as Fabietto is destined to become Fabio and leave Naples, his friends and family are destined to stay behind, to become a collection of simplistic images, sounds, and smells that fail to capture their complexity. Where other semi-autobiographical films might take the reliability of the director’s memory for granted, The Hand of God centers on the shortcomings of memory as essential to the act of remembering.
The climax of the film comprises Antonio Capuano (a film director Fabietto idolizes portrayed by Ciro Capano) pressuring Fabietto to answer the questions posed by this section’s heading. At that moment, however, Capuano might as well be asking the audience to grapple with the stories of their hometowns and families. Although other aspects of The Hand of God contain nuance, Sorrentino uses this interaction to clarify an unequivocal expectation that everyone will find the desire to tell the stories of such people and places.
Barry Jenkins (director of Moonlight and If Beale Street Could Talk) has described his filmmaking philosophy on numerous occasions: “to be universal, you have to get specific.” On its own, the statement provides a great approach to quality filmmaking, but knowing who said it clarifies its purpose as a tool to fight the erasure of Black people and people who identify as LGBTQ+. While the film does not attempt to provoke discussions about queerness or race, those watching closely may find something resonant with Jenkins’ philosophy in Sorrentino’s love letter to the Naples of his youth. The Hand of God does not aim for accurate, authentic representation of people who identify as queer or have been diagnosed with a mental illness or as neurodivergent, but its sincerity to its shortcomings might capture good representation after all.