“Artemis Fowl” is Simply Foul
The definition of the word foul is “offensive to the senses,” which is a pretty good summation of the new Disney+ film, Artemis Fowl

The Rage cannot be contained by bars. It must be unleashed only when your target is primed and ready. But you know, with this kind of fury, nobody is ever really ready. Willing, yes. Ready, no.
The definition of the word foul is “offensive to the senses,” which is a pretty good summation of the new Disney+ film, Artemis Fowl
This is ambitious horror filmmaking, and in a lot of ways, I fully admire its ambitions. For me, the film’s sloppiness defines its overall quality.
We can criticize depictions from old media, but they weren’t simply “good for their time”. They were fighting and struggling in a world we can’t imagine.
“To be universal, you have to get specific”: while the film does not attempt to provoke discussions about queerness or race, those watching closely may find something resonant in Sorrentino’s love letter to the Naples of his youth.
Of the 28 total films I watched, just six of them were queer or featured queer characters in some way.
This drama film is about Priscilla and Elvis Presley's failed marriage through the lens of the title character.